4.7 Article

Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in Youth With Recent Onset of Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 131, Issue 3, Pages E850-E856

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0620

Keywords

inactivity; accelerometer; adolescence; obesity; movement

Categories

Funding

  1. Daichii Sankyo
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: With the rise of type 2 diabetes in youth, it is critical to investigate factors such as physical activity (PA) and time spent sedentary that may be contributing to this public health problem. This article describes PA and sedentary time in a large cohort of youth with type 2 diabetes and compares these levels with other large-scale investigations. METHODS: The Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) trial is a study in 699 youth, recruited from 15 US clinical centers, aged 10 to 17 years with <2 years of type 2 diabetes and a BMI >= 85th percentile. RESULTS: In comparison with the subset of the NHANES cohort who were obese (BMI >= 95th percentile), TODAY youth spent significantly more time being sedentary (difference averaging 56 minutes per day; P<.001) as assessed by accelerometry. Although moderate to vigorous activity levels in both obese cohorts for all age groups were exceptionally low, younger TODAY boys were still significantly less active than similarly aged NHANES youth. Comparisons between the TODAY girls and other investigations suggest that the TODAY girls also had relatively lower PA and fitness levels. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with type 2 diabetes from the large TODAY cohort appear to be less physically active and tend to spend more time being sedentary than similarly aged youth without diabetes identified from other large national investigations. Treatment efforts in adolescents with type 2 diabetes should include decreasing sitting along with efforts to increase PA levels. Pediatrics 2013;131:e850-e856

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available