Journal
PEDIATRICS
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages 1081-1089Publisher
AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2277
Keywords
lead poisoning; school performance; screening-early childhood
Categories
Funding
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health [T42-OH 008428]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services [200-2006-15969-93]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between blood lead levels (BLLs) and reading readiness at kindergarten entry, an early marker of school performance, in a diverse urban school population. METHODS: Kindergarten reading readiness test scores for children attending public kindergarten in Providence, Rhode Island, were linked to state health department records of blood lead testing by using individual identifiers. The study population (N = 3406) was 59% Hispanic. For each child, the geometric mean BLL was estimated by using all previously reported BLLs. Analyses were adjusted for gender, age, year enrolled, race, child language, and free/reduced lunch status as a measure of socioeconomic status. RESULTS: The median geometric mean BLL was 4.2 mu g/dL; 20% of children had at least 1 venous BLL >= 10 mu g/dL. Compared with children with BLLs <5 mu g/dL, the adjusted prevalence ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for failing to achieve the national benchmark for reading readiness were 1.21 (1.19 to 1.23) and 1.56 (1.51 to 1.60) for children with BLLs of 5 to 9 and >= 10 mu g/dL, respectively. On average, reading readiness scores decreased by 4.5 (95% CI: -2.9 to -6.2) and 10.0 (95% CI: -7.0 to -13.3) points for children with BLLs of 5 to 9 and >= 10 mu g/dL, respectively, compared with BLLs <5 mu g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: BLLs well below 10 mu g/dL were associated with lower reading readiness at kindergarten entry. The high prevalence of elevated BLLs warrants additional investigation in other high-risk US populations. Results suggest benefits from additional collaboration between public health, public education, and community data providers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available