Journal
PEDIATRICS
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages E145-E151Publisher
AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Keywords
pediatric; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; quality appraisal
Categories
Funding
- Laerdal Foundation for Acute Care Medicine
- Philips Healthcare
- Cardiac Science Corp
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
- Endowed Chair of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K23HD062629]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of brief bedside cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training to improve the skill retention of hospital-based pediatric providers. We hypothesized that a low-dose, high-frequency training program (booster training) would improve CPR skill retention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPR recording/feedback defibrillators were used to evaluate CPR quality during simulated arrest. Basic life support-certified, hospital-based providers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 study arms: (1) instructor-only training; (2) automated defibrillator feedback only; (3) instructor training combined with automated feedback; and (4) control (no structured training). Each session (time: 0, 1, 3, and 6 months after training) consisted of a pretraining evaluation (60 seconds), booster training (120 seconds), and a post-training evaluation (60 seconds). Excellent CPR was defined as chest compression (CC) depth >= one-third anterior-posterior chest depth, rate >= 90 and <= 120 CC per minute, <= 20% of CCs with incomplete release (>2500 g), and no flow fraction <= 0.30. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-nine providers were randomly assigned; 74 (83%) completed all sessions. Retention of CPR skills was 2.3 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.5; P = .02) more likely after 2 trainings and 2.9 times (95% CI: 1.4-6.2; P = .005) more likely after 3 trainings. The automated defibrillator feedback only group had lower retention rates compared with the instructor-only training group (odds ratio: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.17-0.97]; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Brief bedside booster CPR training improves CPR skill retention. Our data reveal that instructor-led training improves retention compared with automated feedback training alone. Future studies should investigate whether bedside training improves CPR quality during actual pediatric arrests. Pediatrics 2011;128:e145-e151
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available