Journal
PEDIATRICS
Volume 127, Issue 6, Pages E1471-E1481Publisher
AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3007
Keywords
decision-making; systematic review; qualitative research; neurologic disability; enteral tube-feeding; complex chronic condition; children with special health care needs
Categories
Funding
- Pediatric Consultants Partnership, Hospital for Sick Children
- Norman Saunders Complex Care Initiative, Hospital for Sick Children
- SickKids Foundation, Toronto
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand the decision-making experiences, perspectives, and beliefs of parents of children with a neurologic disability around gastrostomy tube-feeding. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies to explore the experiences of parents of children with a neurologic disability around gastrostomy-feeding. We searched 5 electronic databases from inception to July 2010. Two authors independently selected articles and extracted data. Concepts and themes relevant to decision-making were constructed by using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies were selected in which experiences relevant to decision-making were reported. The decision-making process was characterized by decisional conflict. Concepts important to understanding conflict were categorized under 3 themes: values; context; and process. The value and meaning of feeding by mouth and, in contrast, with a gastrostomy tube was the dominant theme that led to internal distress for parents in decision. Feeding by mouth was seen as an enjoyable activity, an important social process, but also a struggle. Gastrostomy-feeding represented a loss of normality, a sign of disability, and a disruption of maternal nurturing and bonding. Context (child and family characteristics) and process (information sharing and support) modified the decision-making experience. CONCLUSIONS: Values associated with gastrostomy-feeding and feeding by mouth, the context of child and family, and the process of decision-making facilitated by the health care system shape parental experiences and decisional conflict. This framework will help guide interventions, such as patient decision aids, that are aimed at improving parental decision-making. Pediatrics 2011;127:e1471-e1481
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available