4.7 Article

Timing of Solid Food Introduction and Risk of Obesity in Preschool-Aged Children

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 127, Issue 3, Pages E544-E551

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0740

Keywords

obesity; infant feeding; complementary foods

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HD34568, HD64925, HL68041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between timing of introduction of solid foods during infancy and obesity at 3 years of age. METHODS: We studied 847 children in Project Viva, a prospective pre-birth cohort study. The primary outcome was obesity at 3 years of age (BMI for age and gender >= 95th percentile). The primary exposure was the timing of introduction of solid foods, categorized as < 4, 4 to 5, and >= 6 months. We ran separate logistic regression models for infants who were breastfed for at least 4 months (breastfed) and infants who were never breastfed or stopped breastfeeding before the age of four months (formula-fed), adjusting for child and maternal characteristics, which included change in weight-for-age z score from 0 to 4 months-a marker of early infant growth. RESULTS: In the first 4 months of life, 568 infants (67%) were breastfed and 279 (32%) were formula-fed. At age 3 years, 75 children (9%) were obese. Among breastfed infants, the timing of solid food introduction was not associated with odds of obesity (odds ratio: 1.1 [95% confidence interval: 0.3-4.4]). Among formula-fed infants, introduction of solid foods before 4 months was associated with a sixfold increase in odds of obesity at age 3 years; the association was not explained by rapid early growth (odds ratio after adjustment: 6.3 [95% confidence interval: 2.3-6.9]). CONCLUSIONS: Among formula-fed infants or infants weaned before the age of 4 months, introduction of solid foods before the age of 4 months was associated with increased odds of obesity at age 3 years. Pediatrics 2011; 127;e544-e551

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available