4.7 Article

Association of Late-Preterm Birth With Asthma in Young Children: Practice-Based Study

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages E830-E838

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0809

Keywords

late preterm; gestational age; asthma; persistent asthma; health care use

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K23 HD059919, R01 HD057168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of late-preterm birth with asthma severity among young children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with electronic health record data from 31 practices affiliated with an academic medical center. Participants included children born in 2007 at 34 to 42 weeks of gestation and monitored from birth to 18 months. We used multivariate logistic or Poisson models to assess the impact of late-preterm (34-36 weeks) and low-normal (37-38 weeks) compared with term (39-42 weeks) gestation on diagnoses of asthma and persistent asthma, inhaled corticosteroid use, and numbers of acute respiratory visits. RESULTS: Our population included 7925 infants (7% late-preterm and 21% low-normal gestation). Overall, 8.3% had been diagnosed with asthma by 18 months. Compared with term gestation, late-preterm gestation was associated with significant increases in persistent asthma diagnoses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.68), inhaled corticosteroid use (aOR: 1.66), and numbers of acute respiratory visits (incidence rate ratio: 1.44). Low-normal gestation was associated with increases in asthma diagnoses (aOR: 1.34) and inhaled corticosteroid use (aOR: 1.39). CONCLUSION: Birth at late-preterm and low-normal gestational ages might be an important risk factor for the development of asthma and for increased health service use in early childhood. Pediatrics 2011; 128:e830-e838

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available