4.7 Review

Staphylococcus aureus infections: transmission within households and the community

Journal

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 437-444

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.007

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; household transmission; community-associated

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH/NIAID) [R01 AI077690, R01 AI077690-S1, R21 AI103562, K08 AI090013]
  2. Paul A. Marks Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus, both methicillin susceptible and resistant, are now major community-based pathogens worldwide. The basis for this is multifactorial and includes the emergence of epidemic clones with enhanced virulence, antibiotic resistance, colonization potential, or transmissibility. Household reservoirs of these unique strains are crucial to their success as community-based pathogens. Staphylococci become resident in households, either as colonizers or environmental contaminants, increasing the risk for recurrent infections. Interactions of household members with others in different households or at community sites, including schools and daycare facilities, have a critical role in the ability of these strains to become endemic. Colonization density at these sites appears to have an important role in facilitating transmission. The integration of research tools, including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), mathematical modeling, and social network analysis, has provided additional insight into the transmission dynamics of these strains. Thus far, interventions designed to reduce recurrent infections among household members have had limited success, likely due to the multiplicity of potential sources for recolonization. The development of better strategies to reduce the number of household-based infections will depend on greater insight into the different factors that contribute to the success of these uniquely successful epidemic clones of S. aureus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available