4.7 Review

Engineering Microbiomes to Improve Plant and Animal Health

Journal

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 606-617

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0919519, 1354666, 0816663, 1150278]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [1150278] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [1150278] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1354666, 0919519] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal and plant microbiomes encompass diverse microbial communities that colonize every accessible host tissue. These microbiomes enhance host functions, contributing to host health and fitness. A novel approach to improve animal and plant fitness is to artificially select upon microbiomes, thus engineering evolved microbiomes with specific effects on host fitness. We call this engineering approach host-mediated microbiome selection, because this method selects upon microbial communities indirectly through the host and leverages host traits that evolved to influence microbiomes. In essence, host phenotypes are used as probes to gauge and manipulate those microbiome functions that impact host fitness. To facilitate research on host-mediated microbiome engineering, we explain and compare the principal methods to impose artificial selection on microbiomes; discuss advantages and potential challenges of each method; offer a skeptical appraisal of each method in light of these potential challenges; and outline experimental strategies to optimize microbiome engineering. Finally, we develop a predictive framework for microbiome engineering that organizes research around principles of artificial selection, quantitative genetics, and microbial community-ecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available