4.7 Review

Effects of Resistance Training in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-analysis

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 126, Issue 5, Pages E1199-E1210

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0445

Keywords

resistance training; child; adolescent; meta-analytic methods; systematic reviews

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT: Although physiologic benefits of resistance training for children and adolescents have been well documented, the impact of age and maturity on trainability of muscle strength remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of resistance training in different age groups and maturity levels. METHODS: We searched electronic bibliographic databases, key journals, and reference lists of reviews, book chapters, and articles. Two independent reviewers evaluated the effects of resistance training on muscle strength for prepubertal and postpubertal healthy children and adolescents (younger than 18 years) by using the results of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. Assessments of muscle endurance and motor performance tests (eg, vertical jump) were excluded. The influence of continuous and categorical moderator variables was assessed by meta-regression and subgroup analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The overall weighted effect size of 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-1.3) was significantly greater than 0 (P < .01). Subgroup analyses revealed maturity to be a significant categorical moderator variable (z = 2.50; P = .01) and positive correlation coefficients were found for the continuous variables duration (r = 0.28; P = .02) and frequency (r = 0.26; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our analysis indicate that the ability to gain muscular strength seems to increase with age and maturational status, but there is no noticeable boost during puberty. Furthermore, study duration and the number of performed sets were found to have a positive impact on the outcome. Pediatrics 2010;126:e1199-e1210

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available