4.7 Article

Late Preterm Infants: Birth Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in the First Year

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages E311-E319

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-2869

Keywords

late preterm; neonatal outcomes; health care utilization; Medicaid; propensity score

Categories

Funding

  1. Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute/Arkansas Biosciences Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To distinguish the effects of late preterm birth from the complications associated with the causes of delivery timing, this study used propensity score-matching methods on a statewide database that contains information on both mothers and infants. METHODS: Data for this study came from Arkansas Medicaid claims data linked to state birth certificate data for the years 2001 through 2005. We excluded all multiple births, infants with birth defects, and infants at <33 weeks of gestation. Late preterm infants (LPIs) (34 to 36 weeks of gestation) were matched with term infants (37-42 weeks of gestation) according to propensity scores, on the basis of infant, maternal, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 5188 LPIs were matched successfully with 15 303 term infants. LPIs had increased odds of poor outcomes during their birth hospitalization, including a need for mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.31 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.68]), respiratory distress syndrome (aOR: 2.84 [95% CI: 2.33-3.45]), and hypoglycemia (aOR: 1.60 [95% CI: 1.26-2.03]). Outpatient and inpatient Medicaid expenditures in the first year were both modestly higher (outpatient, adjusted marginal effect: $108 [95% CI: $58-$158]; inpatient, $597 [95% CI: $528-$666]) for LPIs. CONCLUSIONS: LPIs are at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes during their birth hospitalization and of increased health care utilization during their first year. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e311-e319

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available