4.7 Article

Serial Measurements of Lung Function in a Cohort of Young Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages E1441-E1447

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0668

Keywords

prematurity; bronchopulmonary dysplasia; infant pulmonary function testing; airway hyperresponsiveness; bronchodilator response; midexpiratory flows; forced deflation technique

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to prospectively and longitudinally measure lung function in a cohort of children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) during their first 3 years of life. METHODS: Forty-four children with BPD with a mean (+/- SD) gestational age of 25.6 (+/- 1.7) weeks and birth weight of 0.767 (+/- 0.2) kg underwent serial measurements of lung function (maximum flow at functional residual capacity [V(max)FRC] and functional residual capacity [FRC]) at 6, 12, and 24 months after initial discharge from the neonatal care unit. RESULTS: Compared with normative data, children with BPD had low partial expiratory airflow, measured by V(max)FRC, with mean z score (+/- SD) of -1.92 (+/- 1.04), -1.79 (+/- 1.5), and -1.67 (+/- 1.5) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Over time there was no significant improvement in z scores (P = .66), and 45% of the patients had a z score value of less than -2 (2 SDs below the mean) at the end of the study. FRC measurements steadily and significantly increased over time. Partial expiratory flow showed no correlation with gestational age, birth weight, or length of mechanical ventilation. Mean FRC was significantly higher in children who were using bronchodilators and inhaled steroids but showed no correlation with clinical symptoms. Bronchodilator response was initially present in 30% of the patients and declined to 20% at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 3 years of life, children with mostly moderate-to-severe BPD continue to show significant abnormalities with airflow limitation according to lung-function testing. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1441-e1447

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available