4.7 Article

Dietary and Activity Correlates of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Adolescents

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages E754-E761

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1229

Keywords

soft drinks; correlation; dietary habits; physical activity; population-based studies

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25 CA057712, R25 CA057712-18] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To examine the dietary and activity correlates of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by children in middle and high school. METHODS: Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey of 15 283 children in middle and high schools in Texas. Consumption of sodas and noncarbonated flavored and sports beverages (FSBs) were examined separately for their associations with the level of (1) unhealthy food (fried meats, French fries, desserts) consumption, (2) healthy food (vegetables, fruit, and milk) consumption, (3) physical activity including usual vigorous physical activity and participation in organized physical activity, and (4) sedentary activity, including hours spent watching television, using the computer, and playing video games. RESULTS: For both genders, consumption of soda and FSBs was systematically associated with a number of unhealthy dietary practices and with sedentary behaviors. However, consumption of FSBs showed significant positive graded associations with several healthy dietary practices and level of physical activity, whereas soda consumption showed no such associations with healthy behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of FSBs coexists with healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors, which suggests popular misperception of these beverages as being consistent with a healthy lifestyle. Assessment and obesity-prevention efforts that target sugar-sweetened beverages need to distinguish between FSBs and sodas. Pediatrics 2010;126:e754-e761

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available