4.0 Article

Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in pediatric liver recipients

Journal

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 19-24

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01437.x

Keywords

pediatric transplantation; tacrolimus; immunosuppression; liver transplantation

Funding

  1. Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Staines, UK
  2. Astellas
  3. Novartis
  4. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pediatric liver transplantation is now so successful that we expect more than 80% of children to survive into adolescence and adulthood. As the focus of care shifts toward long-term patient management, immunosuppressive regimens should, in addition to preventing acute and chronic rejection, promote good quality of life and be free of significant long-term side effects. Historically, the most effective immunosuppressive regimens have been based on induction with a combination of calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and steroids. Usually, maintenance is monotherapy with cyclosporin or tacrolimus or dual therapy with low-dose alternate-day steroids to encourage growth. A number of studies, including long-term follow-up, have shown significantly lower incidences of rejection, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and cosmetic side effects in patients treated initially with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin. The use of anti-interleukin-2 inhibitors as induction therapy, with low-dose tacrolimus or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, has a key role in preventing significant renal dysfunction and reducing infection and rejection. Steroid-free immunosuppression is also proving to be an effective option for the management of pediatric liver recipients. The main challenges now facing pediatricians include ensuring long-term quality of life, optimizing immunosuppression while preventing associated adverse events, and managing a smooth transition from childhood to adolescence and adulthood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available