4.6 Review

Phantom perception: voluntary and involuntary nonretinal vision

Journal

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 278-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.004

Keywords

mental imagery; illusions; phantom motion; associative learning; hallucinations; involuntary imagery

Funding

  1. Australian NHMRC [APP1024800, APP1046198, APP1085404]
  2. Career Development Fellowship [APP1049596]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hallutinations, mental imagery, synesthesia, perceptual filling-in, and many illusions are conscious visual experiences without a corresponding retinal stimulus: what we call 'phantom perception'. Such percepts show that our experience of the world is not solely determined by direct sensory input. Some phantom percepts are voluntary, whereas others are involuntarily, occurring automatically. Here, by way of review, we compare and contrast these two types of phantom perception and their neural representations. We propose a dichotomous framework for phantom vision, analogous to the sub-types of attention: endogenous and exogenous. This framework unifies findings from different fields and species, providing a guide to study the constructive nature of conscious sensory perception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available