4.6 Review

No-Report Paradigms: Exracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Journal

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 757-770

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Future Fellowship from Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT120100619]
  2. Discovery Project from Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP130100194]
  3. Herman and Lilly Schilling Foundation
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  5. Research Foundation of the University of Marburg (PhD fellowship)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of consciousness research is to reveal the neural basis of phenomenal experience. To study phenomenology, experimenters seem obliged to ask reports from the subjects to ascertain what they experience. However, we argue that the requirement of reports has biased the search for the neural correlates of consciousness over the past decades. More recent studies attempt to dissociate neural activity that gives rise to consciousness from the activity that enables the report; in particular, no-report paradigms have been utilized to study conscious experience in the full absence of any report. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of report-based and no-report paradigms, and ask how these jointly bring us closer to understanding the true neural basis of consciousness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available