4.6 Article

Upper and lower esophageal sphincter kinetics are modified during maturation: effect of pharyngeal stimulus in premature infants

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 99-106

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2014.147

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [PO1 DK 068051]
  2. NIH [RO1 DK 068158]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P01DK068051, R01DK068158] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that changes in proximal and distal esophageal sphincter kinetics evoked upon pharyngeal provocation undergo longitudinal maturation. METHODS: Pharyngeal stimulation-induced reflexes were characterized using novel pharyngo-esophageal motility methods in 19 healthy premature neonates, studied at 34.7 +/- 0.8wk (time-1) and 39.3 +/- 1.1 wk postmenstrual age (time-2). Graded volumes of air (290 infusions) and sterile water (172 infusions) were infused to define sensory-motor characteristics of upstream (pharyngeal reflexive swallow, PRS) and downstream (pharyngo-lower esophageal sphincter relaxation reflex, PLESRR) esophageal reflexes. Data displayed as mean +/- SE. RESULTS: Threshold volumes were similar with air and water for PRS and PLESRR at time-1 and time-2. Multiple PRS responses were noted with water stimulus and were different between the media (time-1 vs. air, P < 0.0001; time-2 vs. air, P = 0.0003). Dose response relationships for water were significant (P < 0.01 for PRS and PLESRR time-1 and time-2), but not with air. CONCLUSION: Significantly, the recruitment frequency of PRS and PLESRR increases with maturation, liquid is a superior medium for evoking such swallowing reflexes, and stimulus-response relationships for these reflexes are evident. These changes in aerodigestive protective reflexive activity may indicate differences in modulation of excitatory and inhibitory pathways during longitudinal postnatal maturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available