4.6 Article

High- and low-dose OPG-Fc cause osteopetrosis-like changes in infant mice

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 495-501

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2012.118

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Amgen [2008-2009]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AR48337]
  3. Musculoskeletal Repair and Regeneration Core Center [AR046121]
  4. Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) inhibitors are being considered for use in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). We sought to assess efficacy of two doses of a RANKL inhibitor, osteoprotegerin immunoglobulin Fc segment complex (OPG-Fc), in a growing animal model of 01, the colla2-deficient mouse (oim/oim) and its wild-type controls (+/+). METHODS: Treated mice showed runting and radiographic evidence of osteopetrosis with either high- (20 mg/kg twice weekly) or low-dose (1 mg/kg/week) OPG-Fc. Because of this adverse event, OPG-Fc treatment was halted, and the mice were killed or monitored for recovery with monthly radiographs and assessment of serum osteoclast activity (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b,TRACP-5b) until 25 wk of age. RESULTS:Twelve weeks of OPG-Fc treatment resulted in radiographic and histologic osteopetrosis with no evidence of bone modeling and negative tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining, root dentin abnormalities, and TRACP-5b activity suppression. Signs of recovery appeared 4-8 wk post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Both high- and low-dose OPG-Fc treatment resulted in osteopetrotic changes in infant mice, an outcome that was not seen in studies with the RANKL inhibitor RANK immunoglobulin Fc segment complex (RANK-Fc) or in studies with older animals. Further investigations of RANKL inhibitors are necessary before their consideration for use in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available