4.6 Article

UGT1A1, SLCO1B1, and SLCO1B3 polymorphisms vs. neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: is there an association?

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 169-173

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2012.60

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa e Eventos do Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (FIPE-HCPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Jaundice is a physiological phenomenon; however, severe hyperbilirubinemia occurs in only 5 to 6% of the healthy newborn population. It has been suggested that genetic variation could enhance the risk of hyperbilirubinemia when coexpressed with other icterogenic conditions. METHODS: The study included newborns with a gestational age of greater than 35 wk and weights greater than 2,000 g with indications for phototherapy. The polymorphisms from UGT1A1 (rs8175347), SLCO1B1 (rs4149056 and rs2306283), and SLCO1B3 (rs17680137 and rs2117032) were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis and hydrolysis probes. RESULTS: A total of 167 hyperbilirubinemic infants and 247 control subjects were enrolled. The gender, ABO incompatibility, birth weight, and gestational age differed between the groups, but the allelic and genotypic frequency of the polymorphisms from SLCO1B genes did not. In logistic regression, the ABO incompatibility, gestational age, and polymorphic T allele of rs2117032 remained in the model. The presence of this polymorphism seemed to provide protection from hyperbilirubinemia. The individuals who were homozygous for the G allele of rs2306283 and who were glucose 6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficient were more frequent among the cases. CONCLUSION: Although genetic variation accounts for a good part of this condition, the association between different polymorphisms and environmental factors has yet to be explained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available