4.6 Article

Ventilation-Mediated Injury After Preterm Delivery of Ureaplasma parvum Colonized Fetal Lambs

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 630-635

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181dbbd18

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NICHD [12714]
  2. Women and Infants Research Foundation
  3. NHMRC
  4. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Senior Medical Research Fellowship
  5. NHLBI [K08HL097085]
  6. NHFA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ureaplasma species are the microorganisms most frequently isolated from women with preterm birth and are associated with an increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Initiation of ventilation with high tidal volumes (V-T) causes lung injury and inflammation. We investigated whether antenatal colonization with Ureaplasma parvum serovar 3 (UP) would alter the inflammatory response to mechanical ventilation of preterm lambs. Merino ewes were given intraamniotic injections of UP at 55-d gestation, and the lambs were surgically delivered at 128 +/- 1 d gestation and assigned to three groups: 1) gentle ventilation (GV), 2) high V-T ventilation, or 3) unventilated control. Lambs delivered from noncolonized ewes were assigned to parallel groups. GV lambs received surfactant before ventilation with a V-T of 7 mL/kg, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O High V-T lambs received no PEEP and escalating V-T to 15 mL/kg by 15 min. At 15 min, surfactant was given, V-T was reduced to 7 mL/kg, and PEEP was increased to 5 cm H2O. Monocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage were increased by UP, but colonization did not affect lung function. High V-T ventilation increased Egr-1 signaling, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and injury scores compared with GV. Antenatal colonization with UP did not change lung function or modulate the lung injury and inflammation caused by high V-T ventilation. (Pediatr Res 67: 630-635, 2010)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available