4.3 Article

Evaluation of knowledge-based reconstruction for magnetic resonance volumetry of the right ventricle in tetralogy of Fallot

Journal

PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 1532-1540

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3042-9

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Right ventricular volume; Tetralogy of Fallot; Volumetry; Children; Adolescents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Cardiac magnetic resonance using the Simpson method is the gold standard for right ventricular volumetry. However, this method is time-consuming and not without sources of error. Knowledge-based reconstruction is a novel post-processing approach that reconstructs the right ventricular endocardial shape based on anatomical landmarks and a database of various right ventricular configurations. Objective To assess the feasibility, accuracy and labor intensity of knowledge-based reconstruction in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Materials and methods The short-axis cine cardiac MR datasets of 35 children and young adults (mean age 14.4 +/- 2.5 years) after TOF repair were studied using both knowledge-based reconstruction and the Simpson method. Intraobserver, interobserver and inter-method variability were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses. Results Knowledge-based reconstruction was feasible and highly accurate as compared to the Simpson method. Intra- and inter-method variability for knowledge-based reconstruction measurements showed good agreement. Volumetric assessment using knowledge-based reconstruction was faster when compared with the Simpson method (10.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.4 min, P<0.001). Conclusion In patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot, knowledge-based reconstruction is a feasible, accurate and reproducible method for measuring right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. The post-processing time of right ventricular volumetry using knowledge-based reconstruction was significantly shorter when compared with the routine Simpson method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available