4.3 Article

Contrast-enhanced sonography of malignant pediatric abdominal and pelvic solid tumors: preliminary safety and feasibility data

Journal

PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 824-833

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2338-2

Keywords

Safety; Feasibility; Contrast-enhanced US; Pediatric solid malignancies

Funding

  1. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)
  2. Research and Education Foundation of the Society for Pediatric Radiology
  3. General Electric Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little information exists regarding pediatric contrast-enhanced US. To assess the safety and feasibility of contrast-enhanced US of pediatric abdominal and pelvic tumors. This prospective study included eight boys and five girls (mean age, 10.8 years) with abdominal or pelvic tumors. Cohorts of three subjects underwent US with perflutren contrast agent at escalating dose levels. Neurological and funduscopic examination, electrocardiography and continuous pulse oximetry were performed before and after contrast administration. Three radiologists independently scored six imaging parameters on pre- and postcontrast sonography. Inter-reviewer agreement was measured by the Kappa statistic. No neurological, retinal, electrocardiographical or pulse oximetry changes were attributable to the contrast agent. Two subjects reported minor, transient symptoms. Postcontrast US parameter scores improved slightly in 8 of 12 subjects. Postcontrast ultrasound inter-reviewer agreement improved slightly for detection of tumor margins (precontrast = 0.20, postcontrast = 0.26), local tumor invasion (precontrast = -0.01, postcontrast = 0.10) and adenopathy (precontrast = 0.35, postcontrast = 0.44). Although our sample size is small, perflutren contrast agents appear to be safe and well tolerated in children. Contrast-enhanced sonography of pediatric abdominal and pelvic tumors is feasible, but larger studies are needed to define their safety and efficacy in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available