4.3 Article

Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux

Journal

PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 239-244

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-1080-x

Keywords

Vesicoureteral reflux; Voiding cystourethrography; Voiding urosonography; Children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Voiding urosonography with harmonic imaging (VUS HI) has been introduced as a sensitive and radiation-free imaging method for the diagnosis and follow-up of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of VUS HI using a second-generation US contrast agent compared to standard voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). A total of 228 children with 463 kidney-ureter units (KUUs) underwent two cycles of VUS HI and two cycles of VCUG at the same session. VUS HI was performed after intravesical administration of 1 ml of a second-generation US contrast agent (sulphur-hexafluoride gas microbubbles, SonoVue, Bracco, Italy). For statistical analysis we used McNemar's test, Student's t-test and k coefficient tests. VUR was shown in 161/463 (34.7%) KUUs, 57 by both methods, 90 only by VUS, and 14 only by VCUG. Concordance in findings regarding the presence or absence of VUR was found in 359/463 (77.5%) KUUs (k=0.40). The difference in the detection rate of reflux between the two methods was significant (P < 0.01). More importantly, reflux missed by VCUG was of higher grade (2 grade I, 65 grade II, 19 grade III, 4 grade IV) than that missed by VUS (8 grade I, 5 grade II, 1 grade III). VUS HI and a second-generation contrast agent improved the identification of reflux in children. Our data reveal a higher sensitivity of the method compared to VCUG. Thus it can be used as an alternative radiation-free imaging method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available