4.4 Article

High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Impact on Oxygenation and Ventilation in an Acute Lung Injury Model

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 67-74

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21326

Keywords

high-flow nasal cannula; animal model; gas exchange; dead space; lung mechanics

Funding

  1. Nemours Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Vapotherm, Inc. (Stevensville, MD)
  4. NIH COBRE [P20 RR 020173-06]
  5. VapoTherm, Inc.
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR020173] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: High-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) has been shown to be more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in reducing intubations and ventilator days. HFNC likely provides mechanisms to support respiratory efficiency beyond application of distending pressure. We reason that HFNC washout of nasopharyngeal dead space impacts CO(2) removal along with oxygenation. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the flow dependence of CO(2) reduction and improved oxygenation duringHFNCand the dependence on leak around the nasal prongs. Materials and Methods: Neonatal piglets (n = 13; 2-6 kg) were injured with IV oleic acid and supported with HFNC at 2 through 8 L/min. High and low leak around the nasal prongs was accomplished by using single and double prong cannulae, respectively. Measurement of hemodynamic, respiratory and blood gas parameters were made at each setting following 10 min for physiologic equilibration. Tracheal pressures were recorded by transmural catheters. Results: With HFNC, CO(2) trended downward in a flow-dependent manner independent of leak. Oxygenation and tracheal pressures increased in a flow-dependent manner with the greatest effect during double prong. At8 L/min, tracheal pressures did not exceed 6 +/- 1 cm H(2)O. Conclusions: HFNC improves gas exchange in a flow-dependent manner; double prong had greater impact on O(2); single prong had greater impact on CO(2) elimination. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011; 46: 67-74. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available