4.4 Article

Supervised Intelligence Committee Machine to Evaluate Field Performance of Photocatalytic Asphalt Pavement for Ambient Air Purification

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
Volume -, Issue 2528, Pages 96-105

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3141/2528-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of a titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalytic nanoparticle to trap and to decompose organic and inorganic air pollutants makes it a promising technology as a pavement coating to mitigate the harmful effects of vehicle emissions. Statistical models and artificial intelligence (AI) models are two applicable methods to quantify photocatalytic efficiency. The objective of this study was to develop a model based on field-collected data to predict the nitrogen oxide (NO) reduction. To achieve this objective, the supervised intelligent committee machine (SICM) method as a combinational black box model was used to predict NO, concentration at the pavement level before and after TiO2 application on the pavement surface. SICM predicts NO concentration by a non-linear combination of individual AI models through an artificial intelligent system. Three Al models-Mamdani fuzzy logic, artificial neural network, and neuro-fuzzy were used to predict NO concentration in the air as a function of traffic count and climatic conditions, including humidity, temperature, solar radiation, and wind speed before and after the application of TiO2. In addition, an intelligent committee machine model was developed by combining individual AI model output linearly through a set of weights. Results indicated that the SICM model could provide a better prediction of NO, concentration as an air pollutant in the complex and multidimensional air quality data analysis with less residual mean square error than that given by multivariate regression models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available