4.4 Article

Elevated systolic blood pressure in preterm very-low-birth-weight infants ≤3 years of life

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 1115-1121

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-011-1833-x

Keywords

Infant growth; Adiposity; Z-scores; Perinatal-neonatal events

Funding

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Perinatal Pediatrics
  2. George L. MacGregor Professorship awarded

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preterm, very-low-birth-weight neonates (<= 1500 gm, VLBW) exhibit elevated systolic blood pressures (SBP) in adolescence and adulthood; however, the age of onset and causes are unknown. We assessed SBP in a cross-sectional study of VLBW infants at 1, 2 and 3 years of age (n = 40 per cohort). SBP was manually measured using Doppler amplification (observed), and calm values were compared to reference ranges used for clinical purposes (expected). SBP was converted to age-, gender- and height-specific z-scores (SBPz). Perinatal variables and growth parameters measured between 6 and 36 months were assessed as predictors of an elevated SBP. Observed SBP and SBPz exceeded the expected value at each age (P < 0.01); for example 1 year SBP was 94 +/- 10 (standard deviation) vs. 85 +/- 3 mmHg, respectively. Although the expected SBP rose from 85 +/- 3 to 90 +/- 3 mmHg with advancing age (P < 0.05), VLBW SBP was unchanged (P > 0.1), averaging 93 mmHg across ages. Height and weight z-scores were below expected (P < 0.01), while weight-for-height z-scores exceeded zero at 6, 12 and 24 months (P < 0.05). Male subscapular skinfold thickness:abdominal circumference ratio decreased with advancing age, paralleling the decreases in SBPz. The VLBW neonates demonstrated an elevated SBP as early as 1 year of age. Although predictive perinatal variables were not identified, gender-specific relationships between infant growth and SBP were observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available