4.5 Article

Risk Factors Associated With Laboratory-confirmed Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Journal

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1027-1032

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000386

Keywords

apnea; bloodstream infection; central venous line; enteral contrast; hypotension; NICU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSI) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). At the time of evaluation for suspected BSI, presenting signs may be nonspecific. We sought to determine the clinical signs and risk factors associated with laboratory-confirmed BSI among infants evaluated for late-onset sepsis in a tertiary NICU. Methods: This prospective cohort study included infants > 3 days of age admitted to a level 4 NICU from July 2006 to October 2009 for whom a blood culture was drawn for suspected sepsis. Clinicians documented presenting signs at the time of culture. Laboratory-confirmed BSI was defined as per the National Healthcare Safety Network. Multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression random effects model. Results: Six-hundred and eighty eligible episodes of suspected BSI were recorded in 409 infants. Enteral contrast within the preceding 48 hours was the most significant risk factor for laboratory-confirmed BSI [Odds Ratio: 9.58 (95% confidence interval: 2.03-45.19)] followed by presence of a central venous catheter. Apnea and hypotension were the most strongly associated presenting signs. Conclusion: Among infants evaluated in a tertiary NICU, recent exposure to enteral contrast was associated with increased odds of developing BSI. Apnea and hypotension were the most strongly associated clinical signs of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available