4.3 Article

A case-crossover study of infectious diseases and new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes

Journal

PEDIATRIC DIABETES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 583-586

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2012.00886.x

Keywords

case-crossover; hygiene hypothesis; infections; type 1 diabetes; viral

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Infectious diseases have been associated with increased risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this case-crossover was to quantify the role of infectious diseases as triggers for T1D, 1 and 2 yr preceding disease diagnosis. Methods: All children aged 218 yr diagnosed with T1D between 2004 and 2009 among a two million member Israeli healthcare organization were identified (n = 368). For each patient, visits to physicians with symptomatic infectious diseases during 1 and 2 yr before T1D diagnosis were collected and compared. A similar analysis was conducted in a population of non-diabetic members matched on exact date of birth, sex and socioeconomic status (n = 307). Results: The rate of systemic viral infections was significantly higher in the year before T1D onset, as compared to the prior year [27 vs. 7%, respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 4.7, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.98.2]. This difference was most significant among patients diagnosed with T1D at the age of 2 to 6 (5 vs. 46%, respectively, OR = 27.0, 95% CI: 4.51105.4). Among non-T1D patients of the same age group, no difference was found in the proportion of patients with viral diseases 1 and 2 yr prior to T1D diagnosis (44 vs. 49%, respectively, OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.41.6). This unique association was limited only to viral diseases and to patients diagnosed with T1D at young age. Conclusions: Our results indicate that T1D occurring in toddlers is characterized with a relatively low incidence of viral disease 2 yr prior to diagnosis and a much higher incidence in the subsequent year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available