4.4 Article

Evidence for the presence of high risk human papillomavirus in retinoblastoma tissue from nonfamilial retinoblastoma in developing countries

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 185-190

Publisher

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.23346

Keywords

childhood; HPV infection; PCR; retinoblastoma

Funding

  1. Tata Memorial Center [87, 267]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in India is high. HPV infection is known to cause cervical cancer and has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of retinoblastoma (RB), a common intraocular malignant tumor of childhood which can be familial or sporadic. Despite the high incidence of RB in India, its familial form is rare. Hence this study was undertaken to investigate whether high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 are involved in the development of RB. Methods. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded RB tissues (n = 76) including prospective cases with corresponding maternal cervical smears (n = 10) were analyzed for the presence of HPV DNA sequences. Expression of the cell cycle regulatory proteins viz; p105, p107, p30, p16, E2F-1, E2F-4, and MiB-1 was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (n = 34). Results. A total of 53 out of 76 (69.7%) cases were positive for HPV, of these 3 cases were positive for HPV-16, 23 for HPV-18, and 27 for both HPV-16 and -18. Of the prospective cases (n = 10) studied, five cases along with the corresponding maternal cervical cytology smear had identical HPV status. HPV-16 positive tumors were classified as well differentiated (P = 0.013). Nuclear expression of pRB2/p130 showed significant association with HPV-16 infection (P = 0.04) or dual infection of HPV-16/-18 (P = 0.02). Conclusions. Our study lends support to the hypothesis that infection of HPV-16/-18 may play an important role in the development of nonfamilial form of RB in children in India. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58: 185-190. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available