4.4 Article

Dactinomycin and Vincristine Toxicity in the Treatment of Childhood Cancer: A Retrospective Study From the Children's Oncology Group

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 252-257

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22882

Keywords

hepatic toxicity; neuropathy; rhabdomyosarcoma; risk estimation; Wilms tumor

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [U10CA098543]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Dactinomycin (AMD) and vincristine (VCR) have been used for the treatment of childhood cancer over the past 40 years butevidence-based dosing guidance is lacking. Methods. Patient AMD and VCR dose and drug-related adverse event (AE) information from four rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and two Wilms tumor (WT) studies were assembled. Statistical modeling was used to account for differences in AE data collection across studies, develop rate models for grade 3/4 CTCAE v3 hepatic-(AMD) and neuro-(VCR) toxicity, assess variation in toxicity rates over age and other factors, and predict toxicity risk under current dosing guidelines. Results. For the same dose/body size, AMD toxicity rates were higher in patients <1 year than older patients and VCR toxicity rates increased with age. The statistical model provided estimates for AMD and VCR toxicity risk under current dosing schedules and indicated that patients of smaller body size were at lower risk of VCR toxicity than larger patients of the same age. The rate of AMD toxicity was highest early in treatment and was lower in patients who tolerated initial AMD without toxicity. Conclusion. The observed decrease in AMD toxicity rate with cumulative dose may indicate sensitivity in a subgroup of patients while the observed increase in VCR toxicity risk with age may indicate changing sensitivity to VCR. Current dosing practices result in a fairly uniform toxicity profile within age group. However, PK/PD studies should be done to provide further provide further information on best dosing guidelines. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 252-257. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available