4.4 Article

Clinical and Pathological Features of Paediatric Malignant Rhabdoid Tumours

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 29-34

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22231

Keywords

c-Erb; children; malignant; outcome; rhabdoid; tumour

Funding

  1. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0907] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Malignant rhabdoid tumours (MRT) and their central nervous system (CNS) counterparts atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (ATRT) are rare, highly aggressive malignant neoplasms of childhood. Although there are isolated reports of long-term survival with intensive, multimodal therapy, outcomes are generally poor. Procedure. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with MRT/ATRT at Great Ormond Street Hospital over the 20 years from 1989 to 2009. All cases were subjected to expert pathological review including INI-1 immunostaining. Results. In a final cohort of 34 cases, overall survival was 17.4%, with median survival 10.1 months. Outcome in patients aged <3 years was significantly worse (median survival 6.2 months vs. 19.2 months). Data demonstrated a statistically significant benefit of radiotherapy (median survival 14.9 months vs. 6.6 months), although this analysis is confounded by the impact of patient age. There were four long-term survivors (>30 months), all of whom received chemotherapy with or without surgical resection or radiotherapy. In the present study, immunohistochemistry revealed no significant staining for either c-Erb or c-Met in any case, suggesting that targeting these molecules is unlikely to be of benefit in treating MRT/ATRT. Conclusions. in view of poor outcomes, there is a clear need for new treatment strategies and the identification of novel molecular targets for MRT/ATRT. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;54:29-34. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available