4.4 Article

Analysis of Telomeres in Peripheral Blood Cells From Patients With Bone Marrow Failure

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 411-416

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22107

Keywords

bone marrow failure syndromes; Diamond-Blackfan anemia; telomeres

Funding

  1. Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation Foundation
  2. Telethon
  3. PRIN 2006
  4. Banca del Piemonte
  5. Compagnia di San Paolo
  6. ERG s.p.a
  7. Fondazione Banca Popolare di Novara

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The determination of telomere length is useful for the characterization of dyskeratosis congenita (DC) and of aplastic anemias (AA) as well as hematological malignancies. Short telomeres result from a specific defect of telomere maintenance in DC and likely from higher cellular turnover in AA and hematological malignancies. Data are [lot Conclusive for Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA), a pure erythroid aplasia due to defects of ribosomal proteins. Our aim was to evaluate the utility of a qPCR method for telomere length assessment to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of telomere measurement in bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS). Procedure. Telomere length was evaluated by qPCR in peripheral blood cells frorn 95 normal individuals and 62 patients with BMFS, including 45 patients with DBA. Results. Results obtained with qPCR are comparable with Other quantitative methods, such as flow-FISH and Southern blotting. Our data show that only one DBA patient and a minority of other BMFS patients have very short telomeres, defined as less than the 1 st percentile of controls. Conclusions. The qPCR method for telomere length evaluation is an easy alternative to other methods and may thus be valuable in a clinical hematological laboratory setting. Telomere maintenance does not seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of DBA unlike in other BMFSs. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;53:411-416. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available