4.1 Article

Variability of acetylcholinesterase hyperinnervation patterns in distal rectal suction biopsy specimens in Hirschsprung disease

Journal

PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 274-282

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2350/07-09-0343.1

Keywords

acetylcholinesterase; aganglionosis; Down syndrome; Hirschsprung disease; histochemistry; rectal biopsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Variability in cholinergic innervation may contribute to false-negative and false-positive evaluations for Hirsch-sprung disease (HD). We compared intraspecimen variability of histochemical acetylcholinesterase (ACE) activity in 62 distal rectal mucosal biopsy specimens from 33 patients with short-segment HD (SSHD), 14 patients with short-segment HD/Down syndrome (SSHD/DS), 10 patients with total colonic aganglionosis (HDTC), and 45 ganglionated control specimens obtained because of clinical suspicion for HD. Specimens were evaluated in 1-mm linear segments for abnormal distribution and abnormal intensity of staining reaction in the lamina propria (LP), muscularis mucosae (MM), numerical excess of small submucosal nerves (SSN), and presence or absence of large submucosal nerves (LSN) defined as > 35 microns in diameter. Patients with HD and controls were predominantly infant males. Aggregate length of specimens was 186 mm in H D and 136 mm in controls. We defined Multiple patterns and relative frequencies of normal and abnormal ACE reactivity in the muscularis mucosae, submucosal nerves, and innervation in the lamina propria. We verified a hyperinnervation pattern more common in neonates within each subset of HD. Large submucosal nerves > 35 microns in diameter are relatively less common in SSHD/DS and HDTC. Eleven of 57 patients with HD had at least I mm of normal muscularis mucosae accounting for 19/186 mm examined. Ten percent of control mm had at least I submucosal nerve > 35 microns in diameter. Intraspecimen variability in ACE patterns, when extreme, can usually be resolved by findings elsewhere in an adequate specimen, minimizing the need for repeat procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available