4.5 Article

Transient impact of omalizumab in pollen allergic patients undergoing specific immunotherapy

Journal

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 427-433

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/pai.12098

Keywords

omalizumab; specific immunotherapy; seasonal allergic asthma seasonal allergic rhinitis; children

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuernberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundRecently, we showed that combination of omalizumab with specific immunotherapy (SIT) for treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and comorbid seasonal allergic asthma (SAA) is safe and reduced the symptom load in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful manner during the first pollen season. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate long-lasting effects of an initial combination treatment with SIT+omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, in a follow-up period with SIT treatment only in patients with SAR and comorbid SAA incompletely controlled by conventional pharmacotherapy. MethodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab (Xolair((R))) vs. placebo in combination with SIT (depigmented allergoid vaccine, Depigoid((R))) during the first grass pollen season. Omalizumab or placebo therapy was started 2wk before SIT; the whole treatment lasted 18wk. After the first pollen season, SIT was given for two subsequent years without omalizumab. Primary end-point was daily symptom load', the sum of daily scores for symptom severity and rescue medication use in the second and third year. ResultsA total of 140 patients (age 11-46yr) were randomized; 130, 128, and 114 patients finished the study after 1, 2, and 3yr, respectively. The main efficacy variable was the mean daily symptom load as assessed in the patients' diary. No systematic differences between both analysis groups were detected in the findings from symptom load, symptom severity score, or rescue medication score. Further subjective data did not show differences between both groups in the quality-of-life data as assessed with the ACQ, AQLQ, and the RQLQ. Investigators' assessment of treatment effectiveness in the first and second year of study extension showed more patients with favorable long-term treatment outcome (excellent' and good') in the SIT plus omalizumab group than in the SIT plus placebo group. In line with these findings, FEV1 improved at the end of both years in the group which was treated with the combination therapy in the double-blind study compared with the Depigoid plus placebo group. ConclusionEighteen weeks' treatment of omalizumab in combination with SIT in patients with SAR and comorbid SAA reduced the symptom load during the treatment period but showed no prolonged effect during treatment with SIT only. A slight increase in lung function (FEV1) in patients formerly treated with the omalizumab/SIT combination therapy should encourage further evaluation of long-term effects of omalizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available