4.5 Article

The predictive value of skin prick testing for challenge-proven food allergy: A systematic review

Journal

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 347-352

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01237.x

Keywords

skin prick test; oral food challenge; predictive value of tests; food allergy; food; hypersensitivity; peanut; egg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To cite this article: Peters RL, Gurrin LC, Allen KJ. The predictive value of skin prick testing for challenge-proven food allergy: A systematic review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2012: 23: 347-352. Abstract Immunoglobulin E-mediated (IgE) food allergy affects 68% of children, and the prevalence is believed to be increasing. The gold standard of food allergy diagnosis is oral food challenges (OFCs); however, they are resource-consuming and potentially dangerous. Skin prick tests (SPTs) are able to detect the presence of allergen-specific IgE antibodies (sensitization), but they have low specificity for clinically significant food allergy. To reduce the need for OFCs, it has been suggested that children forgo an OFC if their SPT wheal size exceeds a cutoff that has a high predictability for food allergy. Although data for these studies are almost always gathered from high-risk populations, the 95% positive predictive values (PPVs) vary substantially between studies. SPT thresholds with a high probability of food allergy generated from these studies may not be generalizable to other populations, because of highly selective samples and variability in participants age, test allergens, and food challenge protocol. Standardization of SPT devices and allergens, OFC protocols including standardized cessation criteria, and population-based samples would all help to improve generalizability of PPVs of SPTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available