4.5 Article

Validity index for clusters of different sizes and densities

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 221-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.08.007

Keywords

Clustering; k-Means clustering; Unsupervised classification; Validity index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cluster validity indices are used to validate results of clustering and to find a set of clusters that best fits natural partitions for given data set Most of the previous validity indices have been considerably dependent on the number of data objects in clusters on cluster centroids and on average values They have a tendency to ignore small clusters and clusters with low density Two cluster validity indices are proposed for efficient validation of partitions containing clusters that widely differ in sizes and densities The first proposed index exploits a compactness measure and a separation measure and the second index is based an overlap measure and a separation measure The compactness and the overlap measures are calculated from few data objects of a cluster while the separation measure uses all data objects The compactness measure is calculated only from data objects of a cluster that are far enough away from the cluster centroids while the overlap measure is calculated from data objects that are enough near to one or more other clusters A good partition is expected to have low degree of overlap and a larger separation distance and compactness The maximum value of the ratio of compactness to separation and the minimum value of the ratio of overlap to separation indicate the optimal partition Testing of both proposed indices on some artificial and three well known real data sets showed the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed indices (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available