4.7 Article

Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 1093-1103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.08.027

Keywords

Whole-slide histopathological image analysis; Texture analysis; Neuroblastoma

Funding

  1. Children's Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation [CNS-0643969, CNS-0403342]
  3. NIH NIBIB BISTI [P20EB000591]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We are developing a computer-aided prognosis system for neuroblastoma (NB), a cancer of the nervous system and one of the most malignant tumors affecting children. Histopathological examination is an important stage for further treatment planning in routine clinical diagnosis of NB, According to the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system), NB patients are classified into favorable and unfavorable histology based on the tissue morphology. In this study, we propose an image analysis system that operates on digitized H&E stained whole-slide NB tissue samples and classifies each slide as either stroma-rich or stroma-poor based on the degree of Schwannian stromal development. Our statistical framework performs the classification based oil texture features extracted Ming co-occurrence statistics and local binary patterns. Due to the high resolution of digitized whole-slide images, we propose a multi-resolution approach that mimics the evaluation of a pathologist such that the image analysis starts from the lowest resolution and switches to higher resolutions when necessary. We employ an offline feature selection step, which determines the most discriminative features at each resolution level during the training step. A modified k-nearest neighbor classifier is used to determine the confidence level of the classification to make the decision at a particular resolution level. The proposed approach was independently tested on 43 whole-slide samples and provided an overall classification accuracy of 88.4%. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available