4.5 Article

Patient-health care provider communication among patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: Findings from a population-based survey

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages 79-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.002

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Patient-health care provider communication; Satisfaction with health care services; Structural equation modeling

Funding

  1. Department of Defense contract, DAMD [17-03-2-0052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the multidimensional concept of patient-health care provider (HCP) communication, its effects on patient satisfaction with oncology care services, and related racial differences. Methods: The current analysis draws from a population-based survey sample of 1011 African American and 1034 Caucasian American men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The variables of satisfaction with health care services, interpersonal treatment, contextual knowledge of the patient, and prostate cancer communication were analyzed using multiple-group structural equation modeling. Results: Regardless of race, patient-HCP communication was related positively to interpersonal treatment by the HCP, HCP's contextual knowledge of the patient, and prostate cancer communication. More positive patient-HCP communication was related to more satisfaction with health care services. Racial differences were significant in the relationships between patient-HCP communication and prostate cancer communication. Conclusion: Content and interpersonal relationships are important aspects of patient-HCP communication and affect patient satisfaction with oncologic care for prostate cancer. Practice implications: HCPs need to integrate the transfer of information with emotional support and interpersonal connection when they,communicate with men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available