4.5 Article

Development and validation of the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS): Use in six studies of adaptation to a health condition or risk

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 248-254

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.006

Keywords

Adaptation; The Psychological Adaptation Scale; Health threat of chronic condition or risk; Outcomes of coping

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We introduce The Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS) for assessing adaptation to a chronic condition or risk and present validity data from six studies of genetic conditions. Methods: Informed by theory, we identified four domains of adaptation: effective coping, self-esteem, social integration, and spiritual/existential meaning. Items were selected from the PROMIS positive illness impact item bank and adapted from the Rosenberg self-esteem scale to create a 20-item scale. Each domain included five items, with four sub-scale scores. Data from studies of six populations: adults affected with or at risk for genetic conditions (N = 3) and caregivers of children with genetic conditions (N = 3) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: CFA suggested that all but five posited items converge on the domains as designed. Invariance of the PAS amongst the studies further suggested it is a valid and reliable tool to facilitate comparisons of adaptation across conditions. Conclusion: Use of the PAS will standardize assessments of adaptation and foster understanding of the relationships among related health outcomes, such as quality of life and psychological well-being. Practice implications: Clinical interventions can be designed based on PAS data to enhance dimensions of psychological adaptation to a chronic health condition or risk. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available