4.5 Article

Patients feeling severely affected by multiple sclerosis: How do patients want to communicate about end-of-life issues?

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 318-324

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.010

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Severely affected; End-of-life; Physician-patient interaction; Empathy; Communication

Funding

  1. Gemeinnutzige Hertie-Stiftung/non-profit Hertie Foundation [1.01.1/06/009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Investigate multiple sclerosis patients' desire to communicate with their physicians about their disease progression and end-of-life issues. Methods: Persons meeting the inclusion criteria of feeling severely affected by MS were invited via the German MS society to complete a needs questionnaire. Replies to questions on physician empathy and wishes about communication regarding disease progression and death and dying were quantitatively analyzed. Endpoints (point 1 + 2/4 + 5) of 5-point-likert scales are summarized under results. Results: 573 of 867 questionnaires meeting our criteria were analyzed. In response to a general question 64% (n = 358) indicated a wish for disease progression and death and dying to be addressed by their doctor. A majority (76%, n = 427) considered it important that progression of their disease be discussed, while 44% (n = 246) regard addressing death and dying as unimportant. No objective disease criteria could be identified to explain the wish for communicating end-of-life issues. Doctors who were retrospectively viewed as avoiding raising critical aspects of the illness were Perceived as less empathetic (p < 0.001). Conclusion: People with MS have a desire to talk about progression of their disease with their doctors. Practice implications: Physicians should be empathetic in raising critical aspects of the patients' illness individually. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available