4.5 Article

Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 42-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009

Keywords

Physician-patient communication; Cancer; Pain; Patient participation

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [MH72756]
  3. Houston Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence [HFP90-020]
  4. Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians. Methods: Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication. Results: Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control. Practice implications: Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available