4.5 Article

Telephone nurse counseling for medication adherence in ulcerative colitis: A preliminary study

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 182-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.12.010

Keywords

Adherence; Medication; Nursing; Telehealth; Ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. Centene Corporation [0506-010-PC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Adherence is challenging in episodic chronic conditions that require medication during both symptomatic and quiescent periods, such as ulcerative colitis (UC). Adherence for these conditions is under-studied. This study was a preliminary test of telephone nurse counseling to address cognitive and emotional barriers to adherence in UC. Methods: 524 people taking mesalamine for UC were referred by their health care providers, and 278 (53%) enrolled. There were no demographic differences between program participants and nonparticipants. Participants reported multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. All participants received telephone follow-up (M = 2.1 calls) from a registered nurse who used cognitive-behavioral and motivational interviewing counseling techniques. Adherence measured by structured interview was compared to a population baseline using a binomial test. Results: Attrition was 51% over 6 months but was unrelated to adherence. Participants had better adherence than the expected population rate, with a significant dose-response effect. Reasons for nonadherence were primarily psychological or efficacy-related. Conclusion: Adherence following intervention was better than typical mesalamine adherence. Self-efficacy predicted adherence, but demographic and clinical variables did not. Adherent participants reported more adverse events. Practice implications: Attention to patients' cognitive and emotional reactions may help to improve adherence in episodic chronic diseases such as UC. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available