4.5 Article

Using decision aids in community-based primary care: A theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 490-496

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.040

Keywords

Decision aids; Behavioral theory; Racial/ethnic minorities

Funding

  1. UCLA Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly/Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research
  2. NIH/NIA [2P30AG021684]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the effects of informational brochures and video decision aids about cancer screening on patient intention to engage in shared decision-making and its predictors in a racially diverse sample. Methods: Participants were recruited from 13 community-based primary care practices serving racially and ethnically diverse patients in Predominately economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Participants completed theory-based measures assessing attitudes, perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions for working with their physician to make a cancer screening decision after reviewing a brochure or video decision aid, but before seeing the physician. A post-questionnaire assessed screening decisions and participant knowledge. Results: Participants who reviewed a video decision aid had higher knowledge and were more likely to want to be the primary decision-maker. They reported lower perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions to work with their physicians than participants who reviewed a brochure. Participants who decided against cancer screening reported lower intentions to work with their physician in making a decision and were less likely to report having spoken with their physician about screening. Conclusion: Participants who opted against cancer screening after reviewing a brochure or decision aid were less likely to discuss their decision with their physician. The tendency toward autonomous decision-making was stronger among participants who reviewed a video decision aid. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available