4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of pedometer use in combination with cognitive and behavioral support materials to promote physical activity

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 209-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.008

Keywords

step counter; self-monitoring; '10,000 steps/day'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: 1. To demonstrate that combining pedometer use with cognitive and behavioral support materials has a positive effect on physical activity (PA) and attitudes towards pedometer use. 2. To investigate how familiar the study sample is with pedometers and the '10,000 steps/day' recommendation. Methods: From a random sample, drawn from the phone book, 304 volunteered (18-75 year) to complete a questionnaire about familiarity with pedometers and the '10,000 steps/day' recommendation. A sample of 103 participants agreed to wear a pedometer for 3 weeks, and was randomly assigned to a condition with cognitive and behavioral support materials (n = 51) or without these materials (n = 52). Participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire before and after 21 days of pedometer use and an additional questionnaire on the attitudes towards pedometer use. Results: More than 58% had never heard of a pedometer. In both conditions, walking (F = 10, p = 0.002), moderate PA (F = 11, p = 0.001), and vigorous PA (F = 14, p < 0.001) increased over time, however no interaction effects could be found. Significantly more participants in the condition with support materials had a positive attitude towards pedometer use. Conclusion: Wearing a pedometer, with or without support materials, may increase PA. In our study, cognitive and behavioral support materials only affected attitudes towards pedometer use. Practice implications: More research is needed to investigate the effect of combining pedometer use with support materials on a longer time base and in less motivated people. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available