4.5 Article

Primary relapse site pattern in women with triple-negative breast cancer

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 210, Issue 9, Pages 571-575

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.05.011

Keywords

Breast cancer; Triple-negative; Recurrence; Relapse; Metastasis

Categories

Funding

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [HMSP-ICJ/0006/2012]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [HMSP-ICJ/0006/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the remarkable improvements in breast cancer (BC) characterization, accurate prediction of BC clinical behavior is often still difficult to achieve. Some studies have investigated the association between the molecular subtype, namely the basal-like BC and the pattern of relapse, however only few investigated the association between relapse pattern and immunohistochemical defined triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of relapse in patients with TNBC, namely the primary distant relapse site: One-hundred twenty nine (129) invasive breast carcinomas with follow-up information were classified according to the molecular subtype using immunohistochemistry for ER, PgR and Her2. The association between TNBC and distant relapse primary site was analyzed by logistic regression. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis patients with TNBC displayed only 0.09(95% CI: 0.00-0.74; p = 0.02) the odds of, the non-TNBC patients of developing bone primary relapse. Regarding visceral and lymph-node relapse, no differences between in this cohort were found. Though classically regarded as aggressive tumors, TNBCs rarely development primary relapse in bone when compared to non-TNBC, a clinical relevant fact when investigating a metastasis of an occult or non-sampled primary BC. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available