4.5 Review

Inflammation and Barrett's carcinogenesis

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 208, Issue 5, Pages 269-280

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.03.007

Keywords

Reflux-induced inflammation; Barrett's carcinogenesis; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); NF kappa B; DNA damage checkpoints

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is one of the most common premalignant lesions in which normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) develops through progression from BE to low- and high-grade dysplasia (LGD/HGD) and to adenocarcinoma. It is widely accepted that inflammation can increase cancer risk, promoting tumor progression. Therefore, inflammation is regarded as the seventh hallmark of cancer. In recent years, the inflammation-cancer connection of Barrett's carcinogenesis has been intensively studied, unraveling genetic abnormalities. Besides genetic alterations, inflammation is also epigenetically linked to loss of protein expression through transcriptional silencing via promoter methylation. Key mediators linking inflammation and Barrett's carcinogenesis include reactive oxygen species (ROS), NF kappa B, inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandins, and specific microRNAs (miRNAs). Therefore, the decipherment of molecular pathways that contain these and novel inflammatory key mediators is of major importance for diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The detailed elucidation of the signaling molecules involved in Barrett's carcinogenesis will be important for the development of pharmaceutical inhibitors. We herein give an overview of the current knowledge of the inflammation-mediated genetic and epigenetic alterations involved in Barrett's carcinogenesis. We highlight the role of oxidative stress and deregulated DNA damage checkpoints besides the NF kappa B pathway. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available