4.2 Article

Steroid and Xenobiotic Receptor (SXR) as a possible prognostic marker in epithelial ovarian cancer

Journal

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 400-406

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02546.x

Keywords

histological scoring (HSCORE); immunohistochemistry; ovarian cancer; steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR)

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  3. Kurokawa Cancer Research Foundation
  4. All Japan Coffee Association
  5. Japan Coffee Association
  6. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21592119] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the expression of the steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR) and evaluated its clinical significance in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma. One hundred forty-one cases were examined using immunohistochemistry for SXR with archival specimens. All cases were scored using a semi-quantitative histological scoring (HSCORE) method. Specimens with an HSCORE > 60 were regarded as SXR-positive. Various clinicopathologic variables were examined. SXR showed significant differences in age, histology, grade, ER alpha and PR. SXR was detected in 35 of 141 (24.8%) ovarian cancer tissues. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between SXR-positive status and both disease-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.0415 and 0.0316, respectively), independent of stage (P = 0.0167 and 0.021, respectively). In multivariate analysis, SXR was a statistically independent risk factor for both disease-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.049 and 0.0354). Our results support an association of SXR between ER alpha and PR in epithelial ovarian cancers. Our data suggest that SXR is a prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer and may represent a useful marker to identify patients at risk of recurrence or death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available