4.4 Article

Distribution of IgG4- and/or IgG-Positive Plasma Cells in Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: An Immunohistochemical Study

Journal

PATHOBIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages 267-272

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000319873

Keywords

Hashimoto's thyroiditis; IgG4-related sclerosing disease; Plasma cells; Immunohistochemistry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Study Aim: Recently, immunohistochemistry has shown numerous IgG4-positive plasma cells in a subset of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and this type of HT (IgG4HT) appears to be a subtype of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. However, little is known about the distribution pattern of plasma cells in IgG4 thyroiditis. To clarify the distribution pattern of IgG4-positive plasma cells, 33 cases of HT demonstrating abundant lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate were studied. Methods: Using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections, histological, immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction were performed. Results: Fourteen cases were classified as IgG4 HT and 19 cases were non-IgG4 HT. Histologically, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the degree of stromal fibrosis, lymphoid follicle formation, or the presence of phlebitis or fibrous thyroiditis. The present study demonstrated 2 distribution patterns of IgG4- and/or IgG-positive plasma cells, namely the interfollicular (n = 31) and intrafollicular + interfollicular patterns (n = 2). Interfollicular plasma cells were always polytypic intracytoplasmic immunoglobulin in all 33 cases. However, intrafollicular plasma cells in 2 lesions had monotypic kappa light chain by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the majority of IgG4 HT and non-IgG HT cases showed an interfollicular distribution pattern of IgG4- and/or IgG-positive plasma cells. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available