4.5 Article

Spastin mutation screening in Chinese patients with pure hereditary spastic paraplegia

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 845-849

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.04.021

Keywords

Hereditary spastic paraplegia; SPAST; Mutation; MLPA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases. Mutations in the spastin (SPAST) gene are the most common cause of pure HSP. However, few data are available regarding the clinical and genetic spectrum of HSP among Chinese patients. Methods: Clinical data were collected at diagnosis and follow-up of 42 Chinese patients with pure HSP. All seventeen exons of the SPAST gene were directly sequenced. Additionally, we used a multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay targeting the SPAST gene to evaluate large exon deletion or insertion mutations in patients without SPAST point mutations. Results: The age of disease onset of our patients was 19.6 +/- 14.4 years. Six novel variations were found, including three missense mutations (p. L363P, p. D441V, and p. S595R), one insertion (c.1511dupT (p. Y505Ifs*7)), and two larger deletions (exons 5-17 and exons 10-17). Four previously reported mutations, including p. S399L, c.1215_c.1219delTATAA (p. N405Kfs*36), exon 1 deletion, and exon 16 deletion, were detected. The SPAST mutation rate was 40% (4/10) in Chinese familial patients and 33.33% (7/21) in Chinese sporadic pure HSP patients. The frequency of large deletions was high in both AD-HSP (20%, 2/10) and sporadic HSP (14.28%, 3/21). Conclusion: SPAST mutations are common in Chinese patients with pure HSP. Large exon deletions are an important cause of AD-HSP and sporadic pure HSP in Chinese patients. Large fragment tests should be performed to explore large SPAST mutations in familial and sporadic HSP patients without SPAST point mutations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available