4.5 Article

Longitudinal assessment of olfactory function in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 600-604

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.02.009

Keywords

REM sleep behavior disorder; Olfaction; Parkinson disease

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias of Spain [FIS 2006 PI050193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD) is an early marker of Lewy body disorders and is linked to olfactory loss. We evaluated whether olfactory function deteriorates with time in IRBD. Progressive smell loss could be a useful way in which to monitor the effect of disease-modifying interventions in subjects with IRBD. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in which 19 IRBD patients and 19 healthy age and sex matched controls underwent serial clinical evaluations and olfactory identification testing. We used the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) at baseline and after 1.5, 3 and 4 years, and olfactory detection testing with the Smell Threshold Test (SIT) at baseline and after 1.5 and 4 years. Results: Mean UPSIT score was lower (poorer smell identification) in patients than in controls at baseline, 1.5-, 3-, and 4-year assessments. Mean STT score was higher (poorer smell detection ability) in patients than in controls at 1.5- and 4-year evaluations. At 4 years, there were no differences between patients and controls in the rate of change of UPSIT (P = 0.093) and SIT (P = 0.964) scores from baseline. Three patients were diagnosed with Parkinson's disease at 3-year evaluation and one with multiple system atrophy at 4-year assessment. At 4 years, UPSIT and SIT scores did not change from baseline in these four patients. Conclusions: In IRBD, olfactory identification and detection deficits do not worsen over time. Serial olfactory tests may not serve as an outcome measure in future disease-modifying trials in IRBD. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available