4.5 Article

Apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson's patients with subthalamic stimulation contraindications

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 40-44

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.08.010

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion; Neuropsychological assessment; Axial motor symptoms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The efficacy of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (APO) has been evaluated in advanced Parkinson's disease in several open-label studies but never in a population of patients for whom subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) was contraindicated. Methods: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cognitive safety of APO at 12-month follow-up in 23 advanced parkinsonian patients (mean age: 62.3 years; mean disease duration: 13.9 years) whose dopa-resistant axial motor symptoms and/or cognitive decline constituted contraindications for STN-DBS. Their motor and cognitive status were evaluated before APO and 12 months afterwards. Results: After one year, patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, with a mean rating on the Visual Analog Scale of 52.8% under APO. Daily OFF time, recorded in a 24-h diary, was reduced by 36% and ON time improved by 48%. There was a significant reduction (-26%) in mean oral levodopa equivalent dose. Dopa-resistant axial symptoms and neuropsychological performance remained stable. No adverse event was noted and none of the patients needed to take clozapine at any time. Conclusions: APO is both safe and effective in advanced parkinsonian patients with untreatable motor fluctuations, for whom STN-DBS is contraindicated due to dopa-resistant axial motor symptoms and/or cognitive decline. As such, it should be regarded as a viable alternative for these patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available